Things to Do in the Twenty-First Century

CapitalI had thought Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the Twenty-First Century” would be one of those books I would continue to read about but would probably not read first-hand. At 685 pages, its great strength data, its cost new $39.95 (speaking of wealth and distribution), the French economist’s thick tome was not on my list of books to keep an eye out for, let alone add to one of the several stacks of books to read already piled about the house. Piketty’s book is a stack of its own.

In an Isaac Chotiner interview with Piketty at the New Republic , Piketty himself speaks to to the difficulty of reading such books:

IC: Can you talk a little bit about the effect of Marx on your thinking and how you came to start reading him?

TP: Marx?

IC: Yeah.

TP: I never managed really to read it. I mean I don’t know if you’ve tried to read it. Have you tried?

IC: Some of his essays, but not the economics work.

TP:The Communist Manifesto of 1848 is a short and strong piece. Das Kapital, I think, is very difficult to read and for me it was not very influential.

IC: Because your book, obviously with the title, it seemed like you were tipping your hat to him in some ways.

TP: No not at all, not at all! The big difference is that my book is a book about the history of capital. In the books of Marx there’s no data.

But I was wrong. First, fortune brought “Capital” my way. I was walking down to a distant mailbox (like newspapers disappearing, so too are the neighborhood mailboxes). On my way, I looked into our local library box. Only about five or six books. The Believer magazines I’d dropped off the other night were gone. But there at the end of the top shelf in the library box was Piketty’s “Capital.” I picked it up. Looked unread, brand new. Weighed about five pounds. Would it still be there in the box when I got back from dropping off my mail? I glanced through it. Couldn’t take that chance. Not with this kind of fortune. So I walked away with it, feeling a bit guilty though because I knew I might not actually read it, those stacks of unread books about the house already weighing upon me like a seven course meal when you’re not really all that hungry to begin with.

But I was wrong. Second, the book is not all that hard a read. While it probably won’t make anyone’s top ten common reader list, Piketty’s book is clearly written, concise, with well-wrought sentences, and full of remarkable insights and surprises. Consider this paragraph, the subject of which (experiential, anecdotal, or empirical data) revitalizes the current humanities in crisis folderol. Piketty says,

Intellectual and political debate about the distribution of wealth has long been based on an abundance of prejudice and a paucity of fact.

To be sure, it would be a mistake to underestimate the importance of the intuitive knowledge that everyone acquires about contemporary wealth and income levels, even in the absence of any theoretical framework or statistical analysis. Film and literature, nineteenth-century novels especially, are full of detailed information about the relative wealth and living standards of different social groups, and especially about the deep structure of inequality, the way it is justified, and its impact on individual lives. Indeed, the novels of Jane Austen and Honore de Balzac paint striking portraits of the distribution of wealth in Britain and France between 1790 and 1830. Both novelists were intimately acquainted with the hierarchy of wealth in their respective societies. They grasped the hidden contours of wealth and its inevitable implications for the lives of men and women, including their marital strategies and personal hopes and disappointments. These and other novelists depicted the effects of inequality with a verisimilitude and evocative power that no statistical or theoretical analysis can match.

Indeed, the distribution of wealth is too important an issue to be left to economists, sociologists, historians, and philosophers. It is of interest to everyone, and that is a good thing (p. 2, Introduction, A Debate without Data?).

And we learn on page 24 of Piketty’s book (Figure I.I) that income inequality in the United States (1919-2010) was at its lowest between the years 1950 to 1980. From 1980 to today, income inequality in the US has grown steadily, and is now higher than it was during the Great Depression years. Those 30 years of comparative stability (1950-1980) allowed for a sharing of accumulation of capital and knowledge unprecedented and not seen since. The US working class achieved a remarkable degree of middle class provisions, its children went to college in unprecedented numbers, without incurring today’s debt for education, but today nearing or in retirement may be returning to its roots.

 Today’s library box held only three books, none of which I picked up: “A Nun on the Bus”; “Jesus for President”; and “Bernie Sanders: an Outsider in the White House.”

5 Comments Add yours

  1. I find the idea of the library box interesting. Is it because your area is far from the library? What a great idea! I often used to browse the “returned books” shelf at my library because it widened my reading to include new and unknown books. Happy reading!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Joe Linker says:

      Hi, Margie. Thanks for reading and the note. We are not far from a library, about a 2 mile walk, and we go there often, for books and films, particularly children’s books. And I looked for “Capital,” and there were 8 available out of 40 copies – something like that – but new issues usually have holds of much longer times. It just wasn’t a book I wanted to read a library copy of. Anyway, the library boxes are all over the little neighborhoods here. An idea that caught on. The one near our house is next to a bus stop, so it’s a busy library box. I find it interesting to see what goes in and out (how’s that for data?). There is a county library store that sells discarded copies. It’s further off and we don’t go there very often, but they have good books reasonably priced. There was an article in The New Yorker years back, about the San Francisco library converting to computers, and they tossed out indiscriminately dumpster loads of books. Created a bit of an uproar. The New York library has recently been going through a similar change amidst much complaining. One of the themes of “Capital” is accumulation of knowledge, which is itself a kind of capital. But books are a sedentary affair. A personal library requires space, though a little bookshelf can be adequate. Benjamin Franklin is credited as having started the first public lending library. I can picture him walking all around SE Portland making an inventory of the library boxes.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Hi Joe. Thanks for replying and for the follow. Sadly, I don’t frequent my Italian library much as it’s very small and doesn’t have many English books. Those it does have are gleaned from an Italian octogenarian’s list of what they deem to be “Good English Classics”. (Think Oliver Twist, The Secret Garden, and Pride and Prejudice). I have nothing against the classics, I’ve read all of these, but I would like something without six inches of dust and an olde English flavour. I do read Italian, but it takes longer and I don’t know the best authors. I’m learning from my students and have just read a book by Margaret Mazzantini, Twice Born. I read the original, Venuto nel Mondo, and though it took a while to get into it, I really enjoyed it. Am thinking of doing a review on it.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Joe Linker says:

          Reading literary fiction in a foreign language is particularly problematic. I’m not any kind of Italian lit expert, but I’ve read in translation Eco, Calvino (enjoyed the comics), Moravia, Silone’s Bread and Wine is good. What about some Italian blogs?

          Liked by 1 person

          1. I haven’t found any blogs that I really like in italian. You’ve probably read more in translation than I have!

            Liked by 1 person

Leave a Note.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s